Are You Doing the Right Things — or Just Doing Things Right?
Here’s the question that actually keeps founders up, underneath all the others: We’re doing a lot of marketing. But are we doing the right things?
You’re shipping content. Running ads. Refreshing the site. Testing a new channel because someone said it’s working for them. The team is busy, the calendar is full, the invoices are real. And still, some quiet part of you isn’t sure any of it is pointed at the thing that actually grows the company. You can’t tell if you’re building momentum or just generating motion.
The most expensive mistake in marketing isn’t doing things badly — it’s doing the wrong things well.
That doubt isn’t a confidence problem. It’s a signal. And it’s worth taking seriously.
The difference that costs founders the most
There’s an old line from Peter Drucker worth taping to your monitor: “There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all.”
That’s the whole trap. Most founders, when they worry about marketing, worry about execution — are the ads good, is the copy sharp, is the site fast. Those are “doing things right” questions. They matter. But they’re the second question. The first one, the one that decides whether any of the effort pays off, is “are these the right things to be doing at all?”
You can run a flawless campaign for the wrong audience. You can perfectly optimize a funnel that’s built on a fuzzy value proposition. You can A/B test your way to a local maximum on a strategy that was never going to work. Every one of those feels productive — that’s what makes it dangerous. Doing the wrong things well burns money and time while looking exactly like progress, right up until the quarter comes in soft and no one can quite say why.
Getting the aim right is worth more than getting the execution right. A mediocre campaign pointed at the right buyer with the right message beats a brilliant one pointed at the wrong one, every time.
How founders end up busy but not aimed
If this is you, it’s not because you’re bad at this. It’s because of how marketing grows inside a company that’s scaling fast.
In the early days you made every call yourself, by instinct, and instinct was enough — you were close to the customer and the bets were small. Then the company grew. More channels. More budget. A junior hire or an agency. New pressure to grow faster. And somewhere in there, marketing stopped being a few deliberate bets and became a pile of activities, each added reactively — a tactic because a competitor did it, a channel because it was trending, a campaign because it was that time of quarter.
No one decided to stop aiming. It just eroded, one reasonable-seeming addition at a time, until you had a lot of motion and no one whose actual job was to make sure it all pointed the same direction. That’s not a work-ethic gap. It’s a direction gap — and direction is a specific job that quietly went unfilled while everyone stayed busy.
Five signs you’re doing things right but not the right things
Run your company against these. They’re the fault lines between motion and aim.
You can’t name your best-fit customer in one sentence.
If who-you’re-for takes a paragraph and three caveats, every downstream marketing decision is being made on a blurry target. Everything gets a little wrong.
Your budget is spread across “whatever came up.”
Deliberate marketing has a plan you can point to. If your spend is really a scatter of things that each seemed reasonable in the moment, you’re diversified into ineffectiveness.
You can’t name the two or three things actually driving your growth.
Not the things you’re doing — the things that are working. If you can’t name them, you can’t double down on them, and you’re almost certainly overfunding things that aren’t.
Your moves are reactions to competitors.
If your marketing roadmap is mostly “keep up with them,” you’ve outsourced your strategy to a company whose situation you don’t actually understand. Their highlight reel is not your plan.
You add tactics on hunches, not on a plan.
Every new channel or campaign should have a clear “here’s why this fits.” If the honest answer is usually “it felt like we should,” that’s the tell.
No amount of extra execution fixes an aim problem. It just gets you to the wrong place faster.
How to re-aim your marketing
The fix isn’t more effort or a new tool. It’s stepping back to the strategy layer and pointing the whole thing at the right target. Here’s the sequence.
Define the one buyer, and why they really buy.
Not a demographic — the specific person, the problem they’re trying to solve, and what makes them choose you over the alternative (including doing nothing). Write it in a sentence. If you can’t, that’s your first project, and it will sharpen every decision under it.
Find what’s actually working, and follow the money.
Look honestly at where your real pipeline and revenue come from. Usually a small number of things are quietly doing most of the work. Fund those on purpose. Stop treating every activity as equally deserving of budget.
Pick the one bet for this quarter.
Focus is the founder’s superpower and it’s the first thing to go when you’re busy. Choose the single highest-leverage thing marketing should accomplish in the next 90 days, and let it be the tiebreaker for everything else.
Kill the busywork — out loud.
For every marketing activity, ask: if we stopped this tomorrow, would pipeline actually suffer? Keep the ones where the answer is a clear yes. The rest are motion, and motion is expensive.
Put someone senior on the aim.
Here’s the one most founders skip. Aiming is a distinct job — owning strategy, positioning, and priorities, and holding the line when the shiny new tactic shows up. Someone has to own it who has done it before. If that someone is currently “the founder, between everything else,” the aim will keep drifting, because you don’t have the time or the outside distance to hold it.
AI makes this more urgent, not less
If you’re feeling the pressure to plug AI into everything, hold that thought for one second — because AI is an aim amplifier, in both directions. Point it at the right things and a lean team does the work of a much bigger one. Point it at the wrong things and you now produce wrong things at superhuman speed: more off-target content, more motion, more dashboards, a bigger bill, and the same flat pipeline. AI doesn’t fix a strategy problem. It scales whatever strategy you already have — so getting the aim right first is the highest-leverage thing you can do before you automate anything.
Why you can’t fully see your own aim
The hard truth about “am I doing the right things” is that it’s the one question you’re worst positioned to answer about yourself. You’re inside it. You know why each activity got added, so each one feels justified. You can’t easily see the forest because you planted every tree for a reason.
That’s not a flaw in you — it’s true of every founder, and it’s exactly why an outside senior perspective is worth so much here. Someone who has aimed marketing before, who isn’t attached to why each thing got started, can look at the whole picture and tell you, plainly, which things are the right things and which are just busy.
That’s what superwired does. We’re a fractional CMO practice — senior marketing leadership for founder-led and growth-stage companies — and “are we doing the right things” is the exact question we’re built to answer. Not a full-time hire; the direction layer, on the fraction of time it actually takes, wired for how buyers really decide and how a lean team executes in the AI era.
Which things are the right things?
If you suspect you’re mostly busy rather than aimed, take a free 30-minute clarity call. We’ll look at your marketing together and tell you, honestly, which things are the right things — and which ones you can stop doing on Monday. Just clarity on whether you’re pointed at growth or just moving fast.
30 minutes · no pitch


